ISU Communication 1611

哎哟喂，啧啧，连我都要情不自禁说这个Communication 1611可真黑啊真黑啊。
http://isu.sportcentric.net/db//files/serve.php?id=1862
摘抄一下FSU上的总结

引用 :

Changes to Jump base values and GOE in Communication 1611
Key:
Jump: new base value, old base value (change in value)

Single jumps: no changes in base value.

GOE (+++, ++, +, -, --, ---)
New: (0.6, 0.4, 0.2, -0.1, -0.2, -0.3)
Old: (1.0, 0.6, 0.3, -0.1, -0.2, -0.3)


Axel + Doubles
Base Values
1A: 1.1, 0.8 (+0.3)
2T: 1.4, 1.3 (+0.1)
2S: 1.4, 1.3 (+0.1)
2Lo: 1.8, 1.5 (+0.3)
2F: 1.8, 1.7 (+0.1)
2Lz: 2.1, 1.9 (+0.2)

GOE (+++, ++, +, -, --, ---)
Axel
New: (0.6, 0.4, 0.2, -0.2, -0.4, -0.6)
Old: (1.5, 1.0, 0.5, -0.2, -0.4, -0.5)

Double Toeloop and Salchow
New: (0.6, 0.4, 0.2, -0.2, -0.4, -0.6)
Old: (1.5, 1.0, 0.5, -0.3, -0.6, -1.0)

Double Loop, Flip, Lutz
New: (0.9, 0.6, 0.3, -0.3, -0.6, -0.9)
Old: (1.5, 1.0, 0.5, -0.3, -0.6, -1.0)


Double Axel
Base value
2A: 3.3, 3.5 (-0.2)

GOE (+++, ++, +, -, --, ---)
New: (1.5, 1.0, 0.5, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5)
Old: (3.0, 2.0, 1.0, -0.8, -1.6, -2.5)


Triples (toe through axel)
Base Values
3T: 4.1, 4.0 (+0.1)
3S: 4.2, 4.5 (-0.3)
3Lo: 5.1, 5.0 (+0.1)
3F: 5.3, 5.5 (-0.2)
3Lz: 6.0, 6.0 (no change)
3A: 8.5, 8.2 (+0.3)

GOE (+++, ++, +, -, --, ---)
Triple toeloop through lutz
New: (2.1, 1.4, 0.7, -0.7, -1.4, -2.1)
Old: (3.0, 2.0, 1.0, -1.0, -2.0, -3.0)

Triple Axel
New: (3.0, 2.0, 1.0, -1.0, -2.0, -3.0)
Old: (3.0, 2.0, 1.0, -1.4, -2.8, -4.2)


Quads
Base Values
4T: 10.3, 9.8 (+0.5)
4S: 10.5, 10.3 (+0.2)

GOE (+++, ++, +, -, --, ---)
New: (3.0, 2.0, 1.0, -1.0, -2.0, -3.0)
Old: (3.0, 2.0, 1.0, -1.6, -3.2, -4.8)

Overall, GOE has been reduced in both directions (fewer + AND - GOE points).

The "new" values and guidelines are from Communication 1611 (May 2010).
The "old" values or guidelines are from Communication 1494 (April 2008, SOV table), 1504 (June 2008, change to 2A negative GOE), and 1557 (April 2009, Updated GOE guidelines).

关于under-rotation的

引用 :

Jumps and Throw Jumps may, in execution, be lacking intended rotation on the landing
and/or take-off. The elements with lacking rotation will be defined as “Under-rotated” or
“Downgraded” and treated as follows:
• A Jump/Throw with accepted rotation has “missing rotation of ¼ revolution or less”.
• This element will receive full Base Value with GOE at the discretion of every Judge.

• A Jump/Throw will be considered as “Under-rotated” if it has “missing rotation of more
than ¼, but less than ½ revolutions”.
• An under-rotated jump/throw will be indicated by the Technical Panel to the Judges
and in the protocols with a “<” symbol after the element code.
• A jump or throw identified as under-rotated will receive a reduced base value -
70% of the base value of the intended jump/throw rounded to one decimal place. (i.e., if the base
value of a jump is 6.0, then the value of the under-rotated jump is 4.2).
• The GOE values applied to the under-rotated jump or throw will be the same as for
the intended jump or throw.

• A Jump/Throw will be considered as “Downgraded” if it has “missing rotation of ½
revolutions or more”.
• A downgraded jump/throw will be indicated by the Technical Panel to the Judges
and in the protocols with a “<<” symbol after the element code.
• A jump or throw identified as downgraded will be evaluated using the scale of
values (SOV chart) for the element of one rotation less (i.e., a downgraded triple will be
evaluated with the scale of values for the corresponding double).
• Both under-rotated and downgraded jumps will count as the intended jump in the
application of Well Balanced Program regulations.

under-rotate和downgrade现在是两个概念了

郁闷这么久，总算有点好消息了